File #: 20-906    Version: 1
Type: BID, RFP, RFQ, COOP, SOLE SOURCE, OPTION YEAR Status: Passed
File created: 8/7/2020 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/18/2020 Final action: 8/18/2020
Title: Approve the award of Bid 20-255, 2020 Roofing Improvements, to L. Marshall, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $157,400, plus a 5% contingency
Attachments: 1. CIP
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

ACTION REQUESTED:
title
Approve the award of Bid 20-255, 2020 Roofing Improvements, to L. Marshall, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $157,400, plus a 5% contingency
body

DEPARTMENT: Department of Public Works

SUBMITTED BY: Richard Dublinski, Director

BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW:
N/A

BACKGROUND:
On January 27, 2017, the City Manager awarded contract 17-035 to Tremco Weatherproofing Technology, Inc. (Tremco) to conduct roof inspections at 57 municipal facilities for the Department of Public Works - Public Building Operations (DPW-PBO). Tremco completed the assessment and provided DPW with a report that enabled staff to develop an aggressive maintenance plan to extend the life of the facility roofs in acceptable condition and replace roofs nearing critical condition.

The assessment conducted by Tremco confirmed that the roof at the Water Service Center needed replacement. The City's architectural and engineering consultant, Legit Architects, completed the specification and plans for bid.

As part of MB176, DPW issued Bid 20-255, 2020 Roofing Improvements in July 2020, to replace the existing asphalt shingle roof system. This work includes a redesign of the gutter system and front canopy to prevent water from leaking into and damaging internal building components and finishes.


DISCUSSION:

Advertisement Date:
07/09/2020
Notices Sent:
65
Opening Date:
07/27/2020
Planholders:
15


Proposals Received:
02

Bids were received from the following vendors:

Vendor Name
Proposed Cost
L. Marshall Roofing Inc.
$157,400
Tiles in Style, LLC
$325,000

Five contractors attended the mandatory pre-bid meeting. Procurement staff reached out to the other three vendors to inquire why a bid was not submitted. One vendor could not fit the project into their schedule and attempts to reach the other two vendors were unsuccessful.

Due to the low bid cost, in partnership with the city's architectural and engineering consultant, Legit Architects, a contracto...

Click here for full text