CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
ACTION REQUESTED:
title
Table the decision on whether to financially participate in funding a replacement fence along the north side of 95th Street to the May 1, 2018 City Council meeting
body
DEPARTMENT: Transportation, Engineering and Development
SUBMITTED BY: William J. Novack, Director of TED/City Engineer
BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW:
N/A
BACKGROUND:
Resident Doreen Swindall presented the City Council with a proposal for a ten-foot-high wooden fence for the six residents on the north side of 95th Street from west of the Springbrook Tributary No. 2 Creek to Gateshead Drive. The cost of the proposal she obtained was $52,260. There are three basic options the City Council can consider:
Option 1: No City Participation
The City installed an eight-foot-high fence when the road was widened from two to four lanes. The benefitting residents have always had to maintain/replace the fences the City put in. Replacing the existing fence with a taller fence will not necessarily provide screening to the second floor of those homes.
Option 2: Three Way Cost Split Between the City, Will County and the Residents
Will County has been a good partner on this project, and has even been involved in the meetings with the residents requesting the noise wall and fence at this location. This option would be an even split between the three parties. Following City Council discussion, staff reached out to Will County. The County responded that their participation would have to be approved by the Public Works Committee. Even though it has not gone to their committee, staff still wanted to include this option so all options would be available.
Option 3: Full City Participation
This is the option that was presented by Mrs. Swindall at a previous City Council meeting. Staff does not favor or recommend this option. It will replace a 22-year-old fence with a new fence at no cost to these residents while the others in the City must pay for their replac...
Click here for full text