File #: 22-1570    Version: 1
Type: Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/13/2022 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission
On agenda: 12/21/2022 Final action: 12/21/2022
Title: Consider the Petitioner's appeal to the Zoning Administrator's finding in regards to the setback variance granted through Ordinance 21-111
Attachments: 1. Appeal letter and response to standards from Ordinance 21-111, 2. Ordinance 21-111, 3. 214 N Laird Site Plan Encroachment measurements, 4. New site plan, 5. New blueprints, 6. Old blueprints
Related files: 23-0023
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

ACTION REQUESTED:
title
Consider the Petitioner's appeal to the Zoning Administrator's finding in regards to the setback variance granted through Ordinance 21-111
body

DEPARTMENT: Transportation, Engineering and Development

SUBMITTED BY: Adam Beaver, AICP Candidate

ENTITLEMENTS REQUESTED:
* The petitioner is requesting an appeal to the Zoning Administrator's interpretation in order to permit the construction of a porch that is larger than previously approved through Ordinance 21-111.

BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW:
Per Code, official notice in the newspaper is not required.

BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located at 214 N. Laird Street, at the corner of Laird Street and Douglas Avenue. The property owners, Daniel and Jill Ignash, received variance approval through Ordinance 21-111 for a porch to encroach 6.75 feet into the corner side yard (1.75 feet more than what is permissible per Naperville Municipal Code Section 6-2-3:3.2 (Yard Requirements)). In November 2022, the property owners applied for building permits to construct a single-family home. The plans provided in the permit application do not match those that were approved via Ordinance 21-111.

DISCUSSION:
Ordinance 21-111 permitted a variance to Naperville Municipal Code Section 6-6B-7:1 (R1B: Yard Requirements) to allow a porch to encroach 6.75 feet into the required 15-foot corner side yard as depicted on a site plan attached to the Ordinance as Exhibit B.

The building permit that the petitioner submitted in November 2022 included a porch that was approximately 16 feet wider than what was shown on the site plan approved through Ordinance 21-111, resulting in a porch encroachment that is approximately 33% larger than what was originally anticipated. In response, staff rejected the building permit noting that the porch encroachment had to be reduced so that the proposed porch is consistent with the site plan attached to and referenced in Ordinance 21-11...

Click here for full text